Canada faces some very difficult choices in maintaining energy security while meeting emissions reduction targets.

This study analyses Canada’s energy system, and provides an objective assessment of future options to maintain energy security and meet climate commitments. Canadians need a viable and sustainable long-term energy strategy, based on availability, scalability, cost, environmental impacts and alternatives of all energy options.

The study serves as a definitive guide to Canada’s current energy realities and their implications for a sustainable future. It takes a detailed look at Canadian energy consumption, renewable and non-renewable energy supply, the state of Canada’s resources and revenues, and what it all means for emissions-reduction planning.

Download the full study or its summary by choosing an option below. Or select “Chapters” in the navigation bar above to read chapter summaries online (and you’ll find a link to download the extended chapter on each ‘chapter’ page).

Want to start at the beginning?  Read the Introduction now »

Through this website, you can also find news releases, commentary, ways to share, and more information about the study. If you’re an environmentalist, decision-maker or strategist, or an engaged (and perhaps slightly nerdy) citizen, we hope you’ll check it out.

Download summary Download full study
PDF | 28 pages PDF | 180 pages

About the author

Hughes-ForSiteJ. David Hughes is an earth scientist who has studied the energy resources of Canada and the US for more than four decades, including 32 years with the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) as a scientist and research manager.

His research focus with GSC was on coal and unconventional fuels including coalbed methane, shale gas and tight oil. Over the past 15 years he has researched, published and lectured widely in North America and internationally on global energy and sustainability issues. Hughes is currently President of Global Sustainability Research Inc., a consultancy dedicated to research on energy and sustainability issues in the context of resource depletion and climate change. He is also a board member of Physicians, Scientists & Engineers for Healthy Energy, a Fellow of the Post Carbon Institute (PCI), and a research associate with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA).

Hughes has published widely in the scientific literature and his work has been featured in NatureThe EconomistLA TimesBloombergUSA Today and Canadian Business, as well as other press, radio, and television outlets. Recent reports for CCPA and PCI include the following: Will the Trans Mountain Pipeline and tidewater access boost prices and save Canada’s oil industry? (CCPA, May 2017); Shale Reality Check (PCI, February 2018); Can Canada increase oil and gas production, build pipelines and meet its climate commitments? (CCPA, June 2016); A Clear View of BC LNG (CCPA, May 2015), Drilling Deeper (PCI, October 2014); Drilling California (PCI, December 2013); and Drill, Baby, Drill (PCI, February 2013).

About the project

This research was supported by the Canadian Shield Foundation.

This paper is part of the Corporate Mapping Project (CMP), a research and public engagement initiative investigating the power of the fossil fuel industry. The CMP is jointly led by the University of Victoria, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and the Parkland Institute. This research was supported by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).

CMP-logo-colour-horz-7nov2017         Parkland-logo          CCPA_national_logo_rgbSSHRC-CRSH_FIP-colour-on-white

Parkland Institute is an Alberta-wide, non-partisan research centre situated within the Faculty of Arts at the University of Alberta.

The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is an independent policy research organization.


Author: J. David Hughes

Publishing team: Lindsey Bertrand, Shannon Daub, Scott Harris, Alyssa O’Dell, Terra Poirier

Advisory team: Ricardo Acuña, Bruce Campbell, Shannon Daub, Marc Lee

Images © Garth Lenz: Pincher Creek Wind Farms; Oil sands tailings pond.


Edward Schreyer, of the Canadian Shield Foundation, provided the initial support and funding that allowed this project to proceed. Bruce Campbell, former CCPA national director, and Peter Bleyer, current national director, in conjunction with the Parkland Institute, also provided key support. Corporate Mapping Project co-director Shannon Daub oversaw the review and publication of the manuscript and three anonymous reviewers provided comments and suggestions that substantially improved the report. To all of the above the author is most grateful.